Human body Picture Interference And you can Dating Fulfillment Anywhere between Fat And Low-Obese Married Women
OBJECTIVE: To determine body image disturbance and relationship satisfaction between obese and non-obese ple consisted of 100 participants. Data was collected through purposive sampling technique from different gyms and nutrient-clinics of Johar Town, Faisal Town and Model Town of Lahore city. Educated females having minimum education level of intermediate belonging to upper and middle-class families were recruited. The shortened form of Body Shape Questionnaire and Relationship Assessment Scale were administered, in addition to collecting demographic information through a semi structure performa. Independent sample t-test and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation was used in the analysis of the data, using SPSS v.21.RESULTS: Most of obese and non-obese married women (n=) were in the age range of 25-35 years and 30-40 years respectively with mean age of 34 years for obese and 33 years for non-obese married women. Husband’s mean age for obese and non-obese was 39 years and 38 years respectively. Almost all the non-obese (n=) while most of the obese (n=) married women were having education level of 16 or more while almost all the non-obese (n=) were working women and most (n=) of the obese were house wives. Thirty-two () non-obese were having 2-6 years while (n=) obese married women were having 7-9 years of marriage duration. A significant relationship was shown at the level of body image disturbance (p<0.000) and marital satisfaction (p<0.000) between obese and non-obese married women.CONCLUSION: Obesity has significant impact on body image and relationship satisfaction in married women.
Blog post Info
- ACM
- ACS
- APA
- ABNT
- Chicago
- Harvard
- IEEE
- MLA
- Turabian
People are allowed and you will motivated to blog post the things they’re doing on the internet (elizabeth.g., when you look at the institutional repositories otherwise on their site) ahead of and you may into the submitting techniques, as you are able to result in energetic exchanges, in addition to earlier and you will greater citation off had written really works.
References
World Wellness Team. Being obese and you can over weight 2016. Federal Institute out of All forms of diabetes and you may Digestive and you can Kidney Illness. Over weight and you can being obese analytics [Internet] 2012. Burkhauser Rv, Cawley J. Past Bmi: the worth of alot more direct strategies regarding fatness and you may being obese into the personal research browse. J Health Econ 2008;27(2):519-31. DOI: /j. Crowther New jersey, Norris SA. The modern hips width reduce section used in this new medical diagnosis away from metabolic syndrome in sandwich-Saharan African girls is not appropriate. PLoS One to 2012;7(11):e48883. DOI: /diary. Goswami S, Sachdeva S, Sachdeva Roentgen. Human body visualize fulfillment among girls pupils. Ind Psychiatry J 2012;21(2):168-72. DOI: -53. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson Yards, Thomson B, Graetz Letter, Margono C, mais aussi al. Worldwide, local, and you can national prevalence out of obese and you can obesity in kids and you will people throughout 1980-2013: a health-related study towards the Around the globe Burden from State Studies 2013.
The fresh Lancet 2014 Could possibly get 31;384(9945):766-81. DOI: /S0140-6736(14)60460-8. Jernigan In the morning, Tergas AI, Satin AJ, Fader An. Obesity management in the gynecologic cancer tumors survivors: merchant practices and you can thinking. Have always been J Obstet Gynecol 20. Sallis JF, Owen Letter, Fische EB. Ecological type wellness conclusion. From inside the Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Fitness Choices and you will Health Education: Concept, Look, and practice. JOSSEY-Bass, a wiley imprint. John Wiley & Sons, Bay area, Us. Bandura Good. A social cognitive idea out of identity. When you look at the Pervin L, John O, writers. Handbook regarding character. Guilford Publications, Ny, U . s .. Sarwer DB, Lavery Yards, Spitzer JC. A look at the brand new relationships ranging from tall carrying excess fat, total well being, and sexual setting. Obes Surg 2012 Annual percentage rate;22(4):668-76. DOI: /s1step 1695-0step 12-0588-step one. Paeratakul S, Light MA, Williamson Weil, Ryan DH, Bray GA.
Sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic reputation, and you will Bmi in relation to worry about?perception out of heavy. Obes Res 20. McNulty JK, Neff La, Karney BR. Beyond initially interest: physical appeal within the newlywed Feb;22(1):135-43. DOI: -. Arcelus J, Yates A, Whiteley R. Close dating, systematic and you can sub-scientific eating conditions: A glance at the books. Intercourse Family Ther 20. Stokes R. Frederick-Recascino C. Ladies’ perceived body photo connections which have individual joy. J People Aging 2003;15(1):17-31. DOI:/J074v15n01_03. Zawawi JA. Relationships anywhere between Body mass index, Human anatomy Picture Frustration and you may Mental Stress one of Fitness center Ladies Profiles from inside the Zarqa-Michael jordan. Int J Hum Soc Sci 2014;4(1):11-20. Evans C, Dolan B. Body shape survey: Derivation of reduced “choice models”. Int J Consume Disord 1993;13(3):315-21. DOI: -108X(199304)13:step 3 step 3. CO;2-step three. Keys An effective, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura N, Taylor HL.
Indices out of cousin weight and being obese. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(3):655-65. DOI: /ije/dyu058. Hendrick SS. A generic way of measuring relationships pleasure. J 1988;50(1):93-8. DOI:30. AL-Otaibi HH, Naseef SL, Raouf TA. System photo disappointment, pounds updates and you can physical working out one of an example off college students in Saudi Arabia. Food Nutr Sci 2013;4(6):616-twenty-five. DOI:/fns. Seligman MEP. Confident fitness. Appl Psychol 2008;57(1):3-18. DOI: /j. Yamamiya Y, Bucks TF, Melnyk SE, Posavac, Hd, Posavac SS. Ladies’ connection with narrow-and-breathtaking media images: Human body picture outcomes of news-most readily useful internalization and feeling-protection treatments. System Visualize 2004;2(1):74-80. DOI:/j. Lovell GP, Gordon JA, Mueller MB, Mulgrew K, Sharman Roentgen. Pleasure of Very first Mental Means, Self-Computed Do so Desire, and Psychological Better-In Moms and dads Exercising in-group-Mainly based Versus Individual-Based Contexts. Healthcare People Int 2016;37(5):568-82. DOI:333. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Ebneter D, Hunter JA.
Obesity discrimination: new part away from physical appearance, personal ideology, and you will anti-pounds bias. Int J Obes (Lond) 20. Give PG, Boersma H. To make feeling of being pounds: An effective hermeneutic data regarding adults’ factors to have being obese. Couns Psychother Res 2005;5(3):212-20. DOI: 1690500310429. Choo J, Jeon S, Lee J. Intercourse differences in fitness-relevant well being on the intestinal obesity from inside the a great Korean population. BMJ Unlock 20-003954. Bolton MA, Lobben We, Stern TA. The effect out of system visualize toward patient care. Prim Care and attention Partner J Clin Psychiatry 2010;12(2):722-34. DOI: /PCC. Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. Body picture and you can marital pleasure: facts christiandatingforfree toward mediating character regarding intimate regularity and you can sexual joy. J Fam Psychol 2011 April step one;24(2):156-64. DOI: /a001906. Pujols Y, Close BN, Meston CM. The new relationship ranging from sexual joy and the body picture in females.
J Intercourse Med 2010;7(2 Pt dos):905-sixteen. DOI:/j. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam Elizabeth, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, mais aussi al. Neighborhoods, carrying excess fat, and you may all forms of diabetes–a beneficial randomized personal try. Letter Eng J Med 2011 Oct 20;365(16):1509-19. DOI: /NEJMsa1103216. Williams K. Has got the way forward for ination of gender, relationship, and mental well-becoming. J Health Soc Behav 2014 Could possibly get 12;44(4):470-87.